This is a concept that is very much accepted in the writing community. Every writing instructor I have ever had has said this. I've taken a class that explored the links between stories that shouldn't even have links (such as a tale from second century China and a similar tale from African natives), as well as a class on examining how writers harvest what they have read in order to create their art. I swear to you, there is no such thing as a truly unique story concept. There may be an unexplored method of portraying the story, which makes the story itself unique, but it remains rooted in another story.
This isn't something that's easy to explain (other than to say "it's true"). Rather, it's one of those things that can be explored for a lifetime (Joseph Campbell, whom I hate, but can't deny that he's brilliant, has devoted a large amount of research to this concept).
There's nothing wrong with being a skeptic. I can't say that I'm holding out really high hopes, just that I try to remain positive until given reason to feel otherwise.
__________________
"I don't have the knack of victory at all times. I have only learned how not to miss the right moment." Kenshin Uesugi
"If you confer only with people in your own circle (relatives and friends), their opinions will naturally favor you, rendering them useless." Tsunetomo Yamamoto
Fishlore: Aquarists Hobby Forum
http://www.fishlore.com/fishforum/
Hail Lord Ilpalazzo!
Last edited by sirdarksol; June 21st, 2008 at 09:23 PM.
|